As the traditional saying has it. Whether or not murder is in question in connection with the distribution of food supplies in locked down areas of Sarawak, it is undeniable that GPS efforts to restrict the distribution of vital food supplies in the hands of its Assemblymen might well have resulted in deaths from starvation rather than the electoral kudos which GPS hoped to gain from being seen as the food provider in an emergency.

Even that latter motive, as distinct from deliberate starvation, is shameful in the extreme and could only have occurred to a government obsessed with the misuse of public money and the wilful destruction for crony profit of Sarawak’s forests. Essentially the policy of GPS could only have had as a result death and hardship in areas where they lack electoral support. All the legal essentials to support charges of intentional manslaughter are there; even if not admitted by the State legal and police authorities.

The question for Sarawak’s voters must be. Vote for those who tried to starve you; perhaps to death and who have stolen your land and your forests in return for a makan, a few tins of beer and some small change?  OR vote those criminals out, investigate their decades of crime and put those concerned where they are long overdue. In jail